The person harmed by an intentional tort can file a tort lawsuit with the assistance of Personal Injury Lawyer in Kitchener. Each such lawsuit has been filed by the victim of an act that was intended to harm the same individual. Each such act was carried out by a single person. The person that had become the target of that one lone person can file one of the civil injury lawsuits.
Actions that trigger the filing of a civil injury lawsuit
Assault: The person attacked remains unharmed, but the same person fears that he or she will be harmed.
Battery: The person attacked does indeed get harmed.
Imprisonment: Also known as false arrest, this involves use of force or threat of force, in order to hold one or more victims captive in a given location.
Conversion: This is a blue collar version of stealing. The defendant has sought to gain control of another person’s property. Frequently, the defendant has tried to gain possession of land held by another individual. The practice of hacking into someone else’s computer could also be used to aid performance of an act that would qualify as conversion.
Infliction of emotional distress: The plaintiff suffers distress due to conduct exhibited by defendant. The jury must find that the defendant’s conduct goes beyond the bounds of decency. The defendant’s actions should not resemble the sorts of acts that are tolerated in a civilized community.
Fraud or deceit: Fraud involves cheating. The person that has carried out a form of deceit has chosen to use a harmful misrepresentation, in order to commit some type of fraud.
Trespassing: This entails willful movement onto someone else’s property. In some states, such an act does not trigger a need for punishment, unless the guilty party knew that he or she had placed a foot on some else’s land. In other states, the trespasser gets charged with violating one property’s boundaries, even if that same person did not know the exact location of each boundary line.
Defamation: The defendant has knowingly made false statements. Owing to the defendant’s admission of intent, the jury must charge him or her of committing a tort action. The jury decides on the verdict and then expresses the value of what those 12 people consider to be a fair compensation.
The plaintiff could hope for a sizeable award, owing to his or her claimed reputation. On the other hand, the jury might not think too highly of that same reputation. In such a situation, the jury could suggest that the plaintiff deserves only a small reward. That is one time when a jury might send a message that runs counter to the message that the plaintiff had hoped to send.